Link the Labrador wrote:I'm a bit confused when he mentioned that Dawn was big and that everyone was into Bruce Lee. What is he talking about here?
Maybe he's insinuating that Dawn could handle herself not only because she was "big," but also by the martial arts moves she learned watching Bruce Lee movies?
Link the Labrador wrote:It's clear now that Butch is desperate, much more than he had ever been before.
It almost seems like Ronnie knows he has nothing to lose, so he just makes up a new story with each hearing. Kinda like a Book of the Month Club. I'd love it if next year the parole board started off by saying, "Okay Ronnie, what have you come up with this time?"
This year, it seems he might have been trying to blend aspects of Rick Moran's theories into his story (the DEA agent watching the house, the "mystery" over the damaged bullet, Dawn being responsible for killing the kids). In the past, Tracey has mentioned on her board how she liked Moran's theories, and on Moran's ASUP site he mentions how Tracey has contacted him, suggesting that he pen a book about the murders (undoubtedly with the misguided thought that such a book might help with a future parole attempt). Moran refused.
Moran also noted that in 2007 Tracey conveyed a message from Ronnie, telling Moran that he is "the only person who got the murder story right."
During this hearing, Ronnie doesn't mention the DEA car watching the house that night, but he leads us there by saying the family was under surveillence. That's clever. That makes us feel clever for then making the connection to Moran's DEA story, leaving Ronnie to feign surprise. "The DEA admits they were watching my house that night? Wow! I didn't know that!"
That was the first time (to my knowledge) that Ronnie mentioned his family being watched by the Feds, and I believe it's the first time he's mentioned the "damaged bullet." But if Ronnie claims that Moran got the story right, why is Ronnie saying the handgun was used on Louise when Moran claims the handgun was used on Dawn? A bit of a mixup in the story, there.
But in the end I guess it does not matter, as the police lab report confirms that the damaged bullet came not from a handgun, but from a .35 Marlin rifle, just like all the other bullets used that night.
And if Moran's version is correct (as Ronnie supposedly stated), then why does it not match in the following areas:
--Rick claims that Dawn killed everyone while Ronnie was stoned, watching TV; but Ronnie is claiming that he shot his parents with Dawn by his side.
--Rick claims Ronnie never left the house that night until it was time to go to work; but Ronnie claims he
did leave to give ill-gotten money to a friend (while Dawn killed the kids), which goes against what the DEA agent supposedly witnessed.
--Rick claims Dawn threw the rifle into the bay; but Ronnie claims he shot Dawn with that very rifle, which goes against what the DEA agent supposedly witnessed.
--Rick claims Ronnie shot Dawn with his handgun; but Ronnie claims he shot Dawn with the rifle, which goes against what the DEA agent supposedly witnessed.
Obviously Ronnie told Moran that he got the story right because in Moran's version Ronnie only kills his sister -- and that is in self-defense. Maybe in a future hearing we'll hear Ronnie stick with Moran's theory verbatim (despite the police evidence proving Moran's theory is a load of crap -- for detailed evidence on that, read my article on Moran over on amityvillefiles.com).
So Dawn wants her parents dead because they were forcing her to become a stenographer? WTF? Aside from that being the least-plausible motive I've ever heard, surely Dawn could simply move out and live on her own and do whatever she wanted -- especially if she was that upset over it...
So Ronnie's grandfather could protect the family everywhere except Suffolk County? Then why did the family buy a house in Suffolk County?
So Ronnie's father and grandfather put out a contract on his life? Even supposing they wanted Ronnie dead, why bother putting out a contract on him, getting yet another party needlessly involved? They could take Ronnie out for a fishing trip (shooting him and dumping him over) or on a hunting trip (and make it look like he was shot by accident). Why plan it out in advance and risk Ronnie learning about it while he sleeps under the same roof in a bedroom filled with guns? And why wait until the day after Thanksgiving? So he could have a nice final meal?
And why does Ronnie say his grand larceny was for alcohol when it was over the stolen boat motor? Wouldn't this be easy for the parole board to check up on and see it was a blatant lie? Strange...