msmart112 wrote:Yet in his film...he only depicts a situation involving Geraldine as having been married to Ronnie prior to the murders.
Exactly - he already set her up as the "real deal" about 30mins into Part 1.
Yet last night he complains...
SHATTERED HOPES: THE TRUE STORY OF THE AMITYVILLE MURDERS wrote:I have never been anything but candid and honest in this research. Geraldine's veracity is discussed openly in Part III of our film, but these individuals named have every intent of usurping our film before everything we have discovered can be revealed.
Geraldine's veracity will obviously not
be in doubt by the end of Part III, otherwise it renders most of Part I as useless!
Does he think his followers are that stupid?
So anyway, Peter has been served...
Splattered Hopes: The lies Of Katco Media aka Hoax 2.0 wrote:So I was served today at work. The sherrif was laughing his balls off. So did I after just one page . Rybaby...you dont even have a lawyer and contradicted yourself 6 times in the first 3 pages alone.
...and Ryan thinks that by talking about it, we make ourselves "complicit" -
SHATTERED HOPES: THE TRUE STORY OF THE AMITYVILLE MURDERS wrote:The AmityvilleFAQ is going, at the present moment, out of their way to demonstrate their complicity with Peter Pisani, so more Plaintiffs and allegations are on their way in short order with some new Defendants. Keep talking, I am screen capturing
...yet FAQ is mentioned numerous times in the original complaint, so why wouldn't we discuss it?!
So... what IS this all about, really? I mean, Peter should be nothing more than an annoying buzzing in Shattered Hopes ears, swotted away which each new release... yet by making this lawsuit, Ryan is ADMITTING that PETER HAS SOMETHING OF VALUE TO SAY!
SHATTERED HOPES: THE TRUE STORY OF THE AMITYVILLE MURDERS wrote:I want to reach out to our fans and emphasize that we've had to deal with this garbage, but we are on track to deliver Part II in the immediate future
"Sorry it's been delayed for several months now, but I really needed to write a 74 page suit to shut Gerri's son up
SHATTERED HOPES: THE TRUE STORY OF THE AMITYVILLE MURDERS wrote:There are a lot of voices who seem committed to tearing our project down, and their voices outweigh ours at times because, frankly, our supporters have lives and don't spend 24/7 on Amazon and IMDB posting :) flower :) reviews in an attempt to tear us down. This is their mission. And it's being dealt with, as you can see.
Lol - he's really annoyed about those Amazon reviews! But hey, they were honest, and me and Dan wrote them under our own names - so where's the conspiracy?
And how can we "tear down" a $200,000 production with exposure on CBS and Maxim (which Ryan boasts could expose him to up to 6million readers) ? If sales were not as expected, then the problem lies with the product itself, and lack of advertising/proper distribution.
BTW, how do six "bad" Amazon reviews outweigh the nine 5-star ones?
http://www.amazon.com/Shattered-Hopes-A ... ered+hopes
...that's not going to stand up in court!
And IMDB has just 2 reviews - one good, one bad. Real waste of our 24/7 online trashing of his film then.
So here he is saying he has every right to sue anyone he wishes... but then lies about the statistics!
"...and their voices outweigh ours at times because, frankly, our supporters have lives and don't spend 24/7 on Amazon and IMDB posting :) flower :) reviews in an attempt to tear us down
Total good reviews 10
Total bad reviews 7
SHATTERED HOPES: THE TRUE STORY OF THE AMITYVILLE MURDERS wrote:And, how will they deal with the facts and documents presented in Part II, which is forthcoming VERY SOON, which have nothing to do with Geraldine?
That's funny because in the Complaint, Ryan claims "she is featured throughout all three installments of the Plaintiff's film
So there's another contradiction for Peter.
And the whole idea that Peter is hurting sales is pathetic, and shows there is no faith in the "Plaintiff's film" which should be doing the talking for them.
SHATTERED HOPES: THE TRUE STORY OF THE AMITYVILLE MURDERS wrote:DAMN STRAIGHT, WE ARE GOING TO COURT, and I am taking Peter's complicit pals with me. You want to debate me, fine. We will do it in front of Judge Wright in Los Angeles. And BTW, FAQ, get ready to give up a lot of info in formal Discovery. Such as IP addresses and identities, because the subpoenas and interrogatories are going to start flying. Followed by depositions. Debate? Abso-friggin-lutely.