No Shawn, I did not give them permission to use my photo, and sent them an email about 7 hours ago requesting them to take it down. I emailed them through their web site - does anyone have a regular email addy for them? If so, PM it to me please...
And Sherb's right - if he's concerned about people calling his wife names, its Toukee (who isn't a member of this site anymore). But he can't go after Toukee now because Toukee is good friends with Tracey DeFeo, and I believe Christopher is trying to keep on Tracey's good side in the possible hopes of gaining another interview with Ronnie one day (just my theory)...
I think that's why it was only Shawn who was attacked in the previous article before this one. I believe Toukee is now "off-limits" to Berry-Dee...
So lets sum up here... Christopher can write articles on his website centered around GOSSIP being flung between our members, and yet when we find articles about his past (publicly available on the net and apparently published in credible newspapers) and link to them, we are somehow in the wrong??? Hmmm...
BTW, I love how the article says we denigrate Christopher, and in the same sentence it says, "...yet Lutz continually milks this mass murder case vis-Ã -vis his phoney movie ideas, and blatant dishonesty." I guess the term "blatant dishonesty" isn't denigrating anyone, is it?...
"Despite continual warnings, that his web site breaks all of the 'Terms and Conditions' of members postings, this man revels in the ill-gotten notoriety that only the basest form of US society could tolerate - rife are the allegations, counter-allegations and denials of self-confessed pederasts which ruin what is left amongst the Amityville debate."
I honestly can't figure this statement out: "...his web site breaks all of the Terms and Conditions of members postings..." What is he saying? Is he trying to say the members here are breaking the Terms and Conditions of this forum? I seriously don't know if that's what he's saying, or if he's trying to say something else.
And what's this "self-confessed pederast" comment?!? Is he talking about the same two members he previously went after? Isn't that a libelous or slanderous comment?
Dammit... And I was really hoping this forum would get the prestigious New Criminologits'
Gold Star Award...
